Re: [XBL] Abstract

Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote on 01/08/2007 05:21:10 PM:

> On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Steve K Speicher wrote:
> > 
> > Abstract says:
> >     "For example, XBL could in theory be used to implement XForms."
> > seems this is a bit overstating what XBL can be used for.  Perhaps it 
> > would be better to say: 
> >     "For example, XBL could be used to implement the XForms UI 
controls."
> > As this is true for Mozilla XForms extension.
> 
> I'm not sure it really is overstating it. What couldn't be done with XBL 

> as far as implementing XForms goes?
> 
XML Schema validation and master dependency graph I'm sure would not be 
trivial, possible ok, given enough time.  Not sure how usuable.  That is 
why I think the abstract might be overstating it.

- Steve

Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 04:50:24 UTC