- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 02:17:50 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Cyril Concolato wrote: > > <text>This document is about XBL</text> > > <binding> > <template> > <text>This document is not about XBL.</text> > </template> > </binding> > > This binding shows it is possible to change the semantics of a document > using XBL. Remove the sentences. I wrote: > > That's not changing the _semantics_. It might change the _presentation_, > much like CSS generated content can, but it isn't changing the underlying > meaning of the document. The document is still "about XBL", regardless of > what changes you make to the final flattened tree from the XBL layer. Cyril Concolato wrote: > > It seems that everyone has a different definition of "semantics". I just > wanted you to avoid using this word. Maybe rephrasing would help better > understanding what you mean, but I won't fight for this one. I have added a definition of the word "semantics" in the spec. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 02:18:00 UTC