Re: [XBL] Binding Detachment Model

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> 
> 3.10 Binding Detachment Model
> 
>   Then, shadow tree must be removed, the implementation must be removed
>   from the bound element’s list of binding implementations…
> 
> s/shadow/the shadow/

Fixed.


>   If the binding had an extends attribute when it was bound to the
>   element (it may have changed since then), then the user agent must
>   then detach the binding that was attached because of that attribute
>   (if any).
> 
> Does this mean the detachments must happen according to the value of the 
> extends attribute at the time it was originally bound?  Is that not 
> inconsistent with what happens with binding when the extends attribute 
> is modified?  (It may not be inconsistent, since I don’t fully 
> understand 3.7.1.)

Clarified. Please let me know if the next text is any better.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'