- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:36:14 -0800
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF91C2358C.4114B57B-ON8825725D.007BBD26-8825725D.007C2AFA@us.ibm.com>
Hi Ian, XForms has two major components, things that have to do with the data model and things that have to do with UI controls. The data model includes a (fairly simple) data dependency engine and a event-driven processing model with a number of different events defined. These things require a dedicated engine. XBL doesn't help with these features. But XBL definitely makes sense for UI controls. In fact, last I heard, the XForms extension to Mozilla leverages XBL heavily for the implementation of its UI controls. (Steve might know more about this than me.) It's not a big deal with regard to the spec one way or the other, but I think Steve's feedback is on target. Jon Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com> Web Architect, Emerging Technologies IBM, Menlo Park, CA Mobile: +1-650-926-5865 Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Sent by: To public-appformats Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS -request@w3.org cc public-appformats@w3.org Subject 01/08/2007 02:21 Re: [XBL] Abstract PM On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Steve K Speicher wrote: > > Abstract says: > "For example, XBL could in theory be used to implement XForms." > seems this is a bit overstating what XBL can be used for. Perhaps it > would be better to say: > "For example, XBL could be used to implement the XForms UI controls." > As this is true for Mozilla XForms extension. I'm not sure it really is overstating it. What couldn't be done with XBL as far as implementing XForms goes? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic08930.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 22:36:33 UTC