- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:41:50 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0701082138050.22379@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Cameron McCormack wrote: > > 4.3 Attribute Forwarding > ======================== > > …(A QName, such as value in the example above)… > > s/A/a/ Fixed. > In this section, there is one instance of the phrase “=-separated” with > the “=” in orange, but the rest of the times it is black. This should > be consistent. Fixed. > Changes to namespace prefix definitions in the shadow tree that affect > QNames used in xbl:inherits attributes take effect the next time the > attribute is parsed (which must be the next time the attribute is > changed, but may be earlier). > > When is the earlier time that the attribute could be parsed? Whenever the UA feels like it -- the sentence uses an RFC2119 term to allow earlier parsing. > Of xbl:text: > > When used on the right-hand side, it indicates that any raw text nodes > (including CDATA nodes) that are explicit children of the bound > element should be coalesced and the resulting value should be stored > as the attribute on the left-hand side. > > The term “coalesced” is not defined. Though I can guess what it > means for text nodes, it should be defined (or use some more common term > such as concatention in reference to the nodeValues). It also should > mention if adjacency of these text nodes or whether they are element > content whitespace affects this coalescing. Fixed. Please let me know if it's better or not. > “Raw” should also be defined wrt text nodes, or (better) just replaced > with text that explicitly mentions exactly text and CDATA section nodes. Removed "raw". Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 21:42:06 UTC