- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:26:14 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Cyril Concolato wrote: > > In Section 4.7 "Binding inheritance", is this correct to say that a "base > binding of the chain" is a "base binding" if the chain of binding is the first > one attached to the element. I guess so, yes. > In other words, in the example, there is no base binding, because the base > binding of the chains are 'c', 'c', 'd' and 'g' but 'g' implicitely inherits > from 'd', 'd' from 'c' and 'c' from 'a'. The first 'c' is the base binding. > In this example, 'e' is the most derived binding, correct ? Yes. > Please explain the terms also using the example. Done. Thanks, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 21:26:22 UTC