- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Cyril Concolato wrote: > > In Section 3.2.2 "Scripting Model", it is difficult to know what is > being defined by XBL, what is defined by other standards, what is common > practice on the Web but not standard ... For instance the first sentence > says: "Each document that runs script [...] must have a Window object". > This does not seem true in general. Is it a special requirement for XBL > UA. Rephrase the sentence possibly using MUST. Actually it is true in general, but the XBL spec shouldn't be defining this. It should be defined by [Window] or [HTML5]. Unfortunately neither of those is done yet. > What is the status of the second sentence ? Is it requiring that in XBL > that the scopes of script is the Window object or is it restating a > general rule of the Web. If the latter provide a link to the > specification or the former clarify. It's, again, something that isn't yet defined. > What is the definition of "security context" ? Please provide a link. As the spec said: "Security contexts are (or will be) described in the HTML5 specification." I've added "scripting contexts" to that sentence. This is a bit of a messy area, but I'm not sure what we can do that is better than this. Any ideas? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 6 January 2007 09:02:02 UTC