- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:55:18 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
- Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0702210053150.28021@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Cameron McCormack wrote: > > After further discussion in the SVG WG we have resolved that this is too > hacky. :) In a CDF document we do not want all of the HTML elements > implementing this nearestViewportElement property too. It should also > be possible for the nearestViewportElement property to be implemented > without knowledge of which bindings are being used between it and the > svg:svg element. > > Our desire for an interface to traverse up the flattened tree remains. Ok. Your request is still marked as a formal objection. (Since your request directly contradicts another request, I can't satisfy both. I have opted in favour of the other request because your reequest has a workaround, as noted earlier in this thread.) > Incidentally, a use case for full access to the flattened tree was given > to me recently: namely, to be able to construct a “snapshot” of the > document to serialize for non-XBL UAs. That would require an interface > to peek into shadow trees as well as out of them however, and I > understand that there would be more resistance to that than just going > upwards. I don't understand the use case. Wouldn't that be a UA-level feature? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 00:55:33 UTC