- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 13:24:10 +0100
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: member-accesscontrol-tf@w3.org, public-appformats@w3.org
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:21:05 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > One other thing; have you considered other names for this thing? The > current one is horribly generic and confusing. > > How about "Client-Side Web Access Control"? That's fine. If you can come up with better terms than the ones currently used in the document too that'd be awesome. I haven't really been thinking hard about them yet though... I was mostly concerned with getting the algorithm in a decent state. Related thought: I think it would be better if the document was split into an "syntax" part and a "processing" part. The former for authors and tools and the latter for implementors. When I get around to updating it once more I think I'll do that. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 12:24:36 UTC