- From: Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:48:05 +1000
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
- Message-ID: <b21a10670702141848r6898c4b2vb1683c216f658aa5@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Karl, Thanks for your comments. At the moment, the javascript implementation of XBL2 that we are working on is a long way from being complete. We'll be sure to let you (and everyone on this list) know as soon as we make progress on the primer and on the implementation. In the mean time, it would be great if you could provide us some more feedback on the Widgets Requirements Document [1] from a W3C Conformance/QA point of view. Kind regards, Marcos [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/Overview.html On 2/14/07, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have read the early draft of XBL Primer [1], it seems it will be a > very interesting document. > > In the introduction it is said > Please note that at the time of writing > there are no implementations of XBL 2.0, > so everything in this document is > currently untested. > > Then you show graphical examples and then there is a "Status of the > XBL 2.0 Implementation"[2] document. It is a bit puzzling. > > I'll be happy to read it again when the document is more mature. > > > [1]: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/waf/XBLPrimer/ > Overview.html?rev=1.7&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1 > [2]: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/waf/XBLImpl/ > XBL_Status.html > > PS: I have done a quick outlook to XBL 2, but I didn't have time to > make a deeper 2nd review and the date of the 2nd last call has > passed. So I guess it's too late. > > -- > Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ > W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead > QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ > *** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > > > > > -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 02:48:14 UTC