- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:10:06 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 20:10:19 UTC
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Cameron McCormack wrote: > > Hi. > > In ECMA-262 3rd ed, “public” is a reserved word, which means it will > be annoying to refer to the public object from an implementation > object’s methods: > > <implementation> > ({ > xblBindingAttached: function() { > this['public'].x = 5; > } > }) > </implementation> > > I suggest a different property name be used for the public object. Unless I am mistaken, reserved words in ECMAScript don't apply when you are dereferencing an object. so "this.public.x" is fine. However, keeping away from reserved words is a good idea, so I've changed 'public' to 'external' and 'private' to 'internal'. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 20:10:19 UTC