- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 13:51:01 +0100
- To: Brad Porter <brad@tellme.com>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, access-control tf <member-accesscontrol-tf@w3.org>
Looking over this version, this one seems to introduce yet another algorithm: Basically, there seems to be a single allow ruleset and a single except ruleset. This is different from having a list of allow rulesets *each* *of* *which* can then have different exceptions. I wonder what the rationale for the new proposal is. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 2007-02-06 15:25:24 -0800, Brad Porter wrote: > From: Brad Porter <brad@tellme.com> > To: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, > access-control tf <member-accesscontrol-tf@w3.org> > Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:25:24 -0800 > Subject: [ac] Updates to Access-Control document > List-Id: <member-accesscontrol-tf.w3.org> > X-Spam-Level: > X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/45C90E64.6040608@tellme.com > > > I made some minor edits to the abstract, rewrote the introduction, added > a "Background" section and a "Definition" section. > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/waf/access-control/Overview.src.html > > Brad > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 12:49:45 UTC