Re: XBL 2.0 and Access Control

On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 09:35:18 +1000, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>> On May 17 the W3C published a revised version of [2] at [3]. If you have
>> any comments about [3] please send them to public-appformats@w3.org
>> (archived at [4]).
>
> One comment is that the algorithm will need to define how to process IDN
> domain names and IRI addresses, especially in terms of how to compare  
> them
> to each other.
>
> For example, the first page that I would use this on is
> http://xn--74h.damowmow.com/; what should I put in the PI, the fully
> qualified punycode name, or the Unicode name?

The algorithm specified in the editor's draft should allow both, unless I  
mixed something up with the referenced definition of submdomain.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Sunday, 22 April 2007 06:32:59 UTC