- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:19:35 +0200
- To: herve.girod@club-internet.f
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 21:51:00 +0200, Hervé Girod <herve.girod@club-internet.fr> wrote: > I just saw on W3C Web site that Web appformats WG has released a Last > Call Working Draft for XBL 2.0, and I have some questions about the WG > strategy about XBL 2.0 / sXBL relationship. > > - will the sXBL working draft be dropped in favor of the more general > XBL 2.0 (there is a specific chapter on XBL 2.0 with SVG, and it seems, > by looking at the table of contents, that the xSBL TOC is a subset of > XBL 2. TOC too) ? That's my understanding. I'm not sure if there are any plans to update sXBL to point that out though. I suppose that would be a good thing to do once XBL 2.0 reaches either Candidate Recommendation or Recommendation status. > - is sXBL a subset of XBL 2.0, or is there some (volontary) subtle > differences between the two recomandations ? http://annevankesteren.nl/2005/11/xbl lists the differences, but it hasn't been updated to take later changes into account. Then again, I think there aren't that many (later changes). -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 10 September 2006 08:19:51 UTC