- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:18:35 +0200
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
* Mark Baker wrote: >> I have not seen anyone demonstrating there is a need for a XBL2-specific >> internet media type. Can you make an argument to support this request >> that does not depend on fragment identifier semantics and cannot be made >> for, e.g., XML Schema, which also uses application/xml? > >My reasoning is simply that it's advantageous to separate document >data and metadata (i.e. to not sniff) for reasons of security and >efficiency. Could you cite efficiency and security problems in the context of XBL2- processing that imply the need for a XBL2-specific internet media type? Or do you mean you agree that there is no need to add one? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2006 21:25:23 UTC