Friday, 29 September 2006
Thursday, 28 September 2006
- Re: FYI: application/www-form-urlencoded
- Re: FYI: application/www-form-urlencoded
- Re: FYI: application/www-form-urlencoded
- FYI: application/www-form-urlencoded
Monday, 25 September 2006
Friday, 15 September 2006
Thursday, 14 September 2006
Wednesday, 13 September 2006
Tuesday, 12 September 2006
- [XBL] Namespace prefixes in Selectors
- Re: A question on sXBL and XBL 2.0
- Re: A question on sXBL and XBL 2.0
Monday, 11 September 2006
Sunday, 10 September 2006
- Re: A question on sXBL and XBL 2.0
- Re: A question on sXBL and XBL 2.0
- Re: A question on sXBL and XBL 2.0
Saturday, 9 September 2006
Friday, 8 September 2006
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: My position on Web Forms 2.0 and the future of XForms
- Re: XBL media type?
Thursday, 7 September 2006
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: WF2: application/x-www-form-urlencoded encoding ill-defined
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: My position on Web Forms 2.0 and the future of XForms
- Re: My position on Web Forms 2.0 and the future of XForms
Wednesday, 6 September 2006
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: XBL media type?
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- RE: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- WF2: application/x-www-form-urlencoded encoding ill-defined
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- RE: A forms-lite straw man
Tuesday, 5 September 2006
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- Re: A forms-lite straw man
- A forms-lite straw man
- Re: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2
Monday, 4 September 2006
- Re: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2
- Re: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2
- RE: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2
- Re: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2
- RE: tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2
- tone of discussion regarding XForms/WF2
- RE: Manifest (was Re: [WAPFR] too file-centric
Sunday, 3 September 2006
Saturday, 2 September 2006
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
Friday, 1 September 2006
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: My position on Web Forms 2.0 and the future of XForms
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- RE: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- RE: XHTML and MIME
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: My position on Web Forms 2.0 and the future of XForms
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- My position on Web Forms 2.0 and the future of XForms
- RE: [WAPFR] too file-centric
- Re: XHTML and MIME
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- RE: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- RE: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- RE: XHTML and MIME (was: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0)
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: IBM Position Statement on XForms and Web Forms 2.0
- Re: XHTML and MIME