- From: Ed Voas <voas@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:37:15 -0800
- To: public-appformats@w3.org
I'm not sure how this fits, but in our version of this, we were planning to allow multiple icons... <icon size="128">myIcon.png</icon> <icon size="256">myIconBIG.png</icon> How would that fit into an RSS solution? I'm curious because it actually sounds quite interesting. Robert Sayre wrote: > > It's not clear why you need a new XML format for config. It seems > rather optimistic to assume that a format almost identical to RSS/Atom > entries will retain a text-only content model. That is how RSS2 > started out. > > Won't be long before you see > > <description>My <b>awesome</b> new extension!</description> > > All of the widget platforms will have to ship a feed parser anyway. > Use a content model identical to an Atom Entry or RSS2 Item, so we > don't get another title/link/description format and accompanying > semantic drift. It occurs to me that a feed of widgets might be neat. >
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 17:38:54 UTC