- From: Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 22:38:54 +1000 (EST)
- To: Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>, public-appformats@w3.org
In Section 3.7, it currently reads, Consider a case where seven bindings are defined, "a", which inherits from "b", which inherits from "c", "d", which stands alone, and "e", which inherits from "f" which inherits from "g". I think the following makes it easier to read: Consider a case where seven bindings are defined, "a", which inherits from "b" which inherits from "c"; "d", which stands alone; and "e", which inherits from "f" which inherits from "g". ... or maybe you could put them into a list structure: Consider a case where seven bindings are defined: * "a", which inherits from "b" which inherits from "c"; * "d", which stands alone; * and "e", which inherits from "f" which inherits from "g". For me, either of the above two options makes it easier to follow. --- Creative Industries Faculty Queensland University of Technology +61423 142 435 www.datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 12:39:09 UTC