- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:54:36 -0800
- To: annevk@opera.com
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
Actually I'd say it the other way around --- if some one is doing something ugly like nested html tables to get a particular look and feel, I'd rather that they used clean markup in their original content, and used the html tables hackery they need to do on the XBL rendering tree. That still begs the question as to where the assistive technology should look to discover what it should do with the <my-new-fancy-grid-element> Anne van Kesteren writes: > > I'm not sure if this is material for the XBL Primer or the XBL 2.0 > specification, but either has to address some authoring issues. Is using > an HTML <table> for presentational reasons inside an XBL <template> > harmful or not? If it's bad, is that because non-visual user agents might > try to process XBL as well? Such as assistive technology (screen readers) > or speech browsers. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/> > -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2006 23:55:07 UTC