Wednesday, 29 November 2006
- Minutes from WAF WG's October 26 discussion about XBL2
- [XBL2] Disposition of LC Comments documents
- [XBL] Editorial: diagram in section 3.7
- [XBL] Clarificaiton: xblBindingAttached() and other events
- [XBL] Provide Example for section 5.1
- [XBL] Editorial: typo in section 4.9.1
Tuesday, 28 November 2006
Monday, 27 November 2006
Sunday, 26 November 2006
Friday, 24 November 2006
Thursday, 23 November 2006
Wednesday, 22 November 2006
Monday, 20 November 2006
Friday, 17 November 2006
Thursday, 16 November 2006
Wednesday, 15 November 2006
- [Widgets] Restriction to index.html
- Re: Is there some XUL project at W3C?
- [XBL] prefetch element underspecified?
Tuesday, 14 November 2006
Monday, 13 November 2006
- Re: Widgets id element
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- Re: widgets feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- Re: [Widgets] also a feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
Friday, 10 November 2006
- Widgets id element
- widgets feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Signing
- Re: [Widgets] Signing
- [Widgets] Signing
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- [Widgets] also a feedback
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- [xbl] Editorial: section title 4.4.1 should be removed
- [XBL] Editorial: splitting section 4.3 into sub sections and cleaned up
- [XBL] Editorial: repreated word in section 4.3
- Re: [Widgets] Brief feedback
- Need an XBL media type
- First Public Working Draft of Widgets 1.0 spec
- [Widgets] Brief feedback
Tuesday, 7 November 2006
- Re: [XBL] Question: stopping event forwarding in section 3.10
- Re: [XBL] Editorial: make example for 3.7.3 easier
- Re: [XBL] Editorial: mistake in example in section 3.7.2
- Re: [XBL] Editorial: legibility in section 3.7.1
- Re: [XBL] Editorial: another diagram in section 3.7
- Re: [XBL] Editorial: legibility suggestion
- Re: [XBL] Editorial: spelling mistake
Friday, 3 November 2006
- [XBL] Editorial: suggestion for section 3.4 regarding xbl-bound event
- [XBL] clarification: explicit children must be redistributed?
- [XBL] Event Inteface is not referenced
- [XBL] Editorial (Existential?): name vs identifier
- [XBL] Editorial: spelling mistake
Thursday, 2 November 2006
- [XBL] Editorial: no link to pseudo elements
- [XBL] Clarification: Note in section 2.8
- [XBL] Editorial: repeated word
- [XBL] Clarification: Define QNames
- [XBL] Editorial: example not well-formed
- [XBL] Clarification: Locked attribute
- [XBL] Clarification: define CSS can cross scopes?
- [XBL] Content: define "author style sheets"
- [XBL] editorial: 'Prettier' considered harmful
- [XBL] editorial: no link to 'in error'
Wednesday, 1 November 2006
- [XBL] Semantics, assistive technology
- Re: [XBL] Semantics, assistive technology
- [XBL] Editorial: <implementaiton> also talks about "styling language"
- [XBL] Editorial: <script> talks about "styling language"
- [XBL] <div>.className?
- [XBL] XBLContentElement
- [XBL] Semantics, assistive technology
- [XBL] Error: Non-Well-Formed XML Example