- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 22:31:19 +0100
- To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 22:36:41 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > This is a last call comment on the XBL 2 Editor’s Draft (dated 27 > October 2006). > > I’d just like to confirm that CSS support is not required for a > conforming XBL implementation. I can imagine for example SVG Tiny 1.2 > implementations that implement XBL 2.0 but not mandating CSS support, > and I wouldn’t want those invalidated. What makes you think it is? (It's not required, nor is ECMAScript. Selectors is.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 21:31:44 UTC