- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:03:30 +0100
- To: "Cyril Concolato" <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:34:28 +0100, Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr> wrote: > This email comments on the 7 September 2006 LCWD of XBL 2.0. > > In Section 8, the specification defines a number of interfaces but the > naming is not consistent: > DocumentXBL > ElementXBL > XBLContentElement > XBLTemplateElement > EventXBL > > Either name the interfaces XBL* or *XBL, it would be easier to remember > names and write code. The naming is consistent. XBL* indicates a specific interface and *XBL indicates that * implements that interface. Most DOM specifications use this convention. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 15:03:47 UTC