- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 17:34:17 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > Can you please respond to these emails in such a way that they conform > to the last call requirements? (ie. by asking the sender if they are > satisfied with your response). It saves the Working Group having to > chase up unsolved issues at the F2f meetings. For those who are emailing > comments, you must state if you are satisfied with Ian's response to > your comments. W3C process requirements do not require that responses include a request to have the reviewer state their satisfaction with the response, nor do they require the working group to "chase up" issues that the reviewer has not confirmed they agree to. Reviewers are not required to respond with approval. See section 3.3.3 of the process document (and RFC2119). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 17:34:32 UTC