- From: Matthew Atkinson <matkinson@tpgi.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 15:43:31 +0000
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
Hi all,
Minutes for today can be found at https://www.w3.org/2023/02/01-apa-minutes.html and below in plain text.
Best regards,
Matthew
– DRAFT –
Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Weekly Teleconference
01 February 2023
[2]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/2023/02/01-apa-irc
Attendees
Present
Fazio, Fredrik, janina, matatk, mike_beganyi, PaulG, Roy
Regrets
Alisa, Gottfried, Niklas
Chair
Janina
Scribe
matatk, mike_beganyi
Contents
1. [3]Agenda Review & Announcements
2. [4]Open CfC Elevating Maturity Model to Task Force httpS://
www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/maturity-model/
work-statementtatus
3. [5]APA Rechartering: Ready for CfC? https://github.com/w3c/
apa/blob/charter-2023/charter.html
4. [6]New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/
issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+
requested%22
5. [7]Explicit Review Requests https://github.com/w3c/
a11y-request/issues
1. [8]Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2
2. [9]RDF Dataset Canonicalization
6. [10]A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/
horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
7. [11]new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
8. [12]CSS Update (Paul) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/
issues
9. [13]Actions Checkin (Specs) https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/
track/actions/open
10. [14]Task Force & Deliverables Updates
11. [15]Other Business
12. [16]be done
13. [17]Summary of resolutions
Meeting minutes
Agenda Review & Announcements
janina: standard agendum plus new item. no specific
announcements on the agenda
Open CfC Elevating Maturity Model to Task Force [18]httpS://
www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/maturity-model/work-statementtatus
[18] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/maturity-model/work-statementtatus
<Roy> [19]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/
maturity-model/work-statement
[19] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/maturity-model/work-statement
<Fazio> I'm here to answer questions
janina: reminder that the CFC, proposes subgroup of maturity
model and making them their own TF. a lot of votes have come in
but please get votes in. CFC closes at midnight Boston time
Friday
Fazio: do we want to bring up questions about equity
janina: discussed last week. thought equity questions were
about the maturity model itslef and not the work statement
Fazio: that's correct, Janina
janina: if there are ways to scope in something we aren't
currently in a11y, or scope in technology that we're not seeing
as being web driven, then yes we should revisit the scope
APA Rechartering: Ready for CfC? [20]https://github.com/w3c/apa/blob/
charter-2023/charter.html
[20] https://github.com/w3c/apa/blob/charter-2023/charter.html
janina: Question for the group: are we ready to go for a call
for consensus (CfC) on our APA charter?
… Now is the time to scope in anything that you feel is
relevant. This charter will govern our work until some time in
2025 (it's a 2-year charter).
<Fredrik> FYI: I can't get in through the Zoom link. No idea
what is going on. It looks as though I'm alone in the meeting.
And yes, I'm using "our" link from the APA meeting page...
janina: E.g. if we want to make overlay tech in scope, now is
the time to ask for it. Same applies for all of our
deliverables.
janina: Questions/comments?
Rendered HTML view of proposed charter: [21]https://
raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/charter-2023/charter.html
[21] https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/charter-2023/charter.html
<janina> DRAFT RESOLUTION: APA avers we are ready for a Call
for Consensus on our draft proposed Charter at [22]https://
github.com/w3c/apa/blob/charter-2023/charter.html -- taken up
[from janina]
[22] https://github.com/w3c/apa/blob/charter-2023/charter.html
<janina> +1
<PaulG> +1
<Roy> +1
+1
matatk: Propses a sentence at the start of the external orgs
section to explain it's as-and-when, and we have worked with
those in the past. Assume it's editorial though.
janina: *confirms it's editorial*
<Fazio> +1
janina: We met with Web Payment Security Interest Group a
couple of weeks back; was a productive meeting; intent to
continue working with them.
matatk: We should add Blissymbolics Communication International
(as we are working with them).
janina: Yes.
+1 (to CfC on charter)
janina: I asked Roy to look for refs to "Personalization" and
update to "WAI-Adapt"
Roy: Due to IP/process issues, we do need to retain some
references to "Personalization Semantics Content Module" as
it's a current draft.
<Fredrik> ]q on CFC on teh Chartert, /1 on Zoom connection
(from my side at least; can anyone see me in the meeting?).
janina: Let's agree to update that draft before this gets to
the AC, to avoid confusion.
<Fredrik> Thanks Mat - working on it...
RESOLUTION: APA avers we are ready for a Call for Consensus on
our draft proposed Charter at [23]https://github.com/w3c/apa/
blob/charter-2023/charter.html
[23] https://github.com/w3c/apa/blob/charter-2023/charter.html
New Charters Review [24]https://github.com/w3c/strategy/
issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%2
2
[24] https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:"Horizontal+review+requested"
Roy: No new charters this week.
Explicit Review Requests [25]https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/
issues
[25] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2
<Roy> - issue: [26]w3c/a11y-request#52
[26] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues/52
<Roy> - due date: 2023-02-24
matatk: I'll look at it.
RDF Dataset Canonicalization
<Roy> - issue: [27]w3c/a11y-request#51
[27] https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues/51
<Roy> - tracked: [28]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/
RDF_Dataset_Canonicalization
[28] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/RDF_Dataset_Canonicalization
<Roy> - spec: [29]https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-canon/
[29] https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-canon/
<Roy> [30]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/
RDF_Dataset_Canonicalization
[30] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/RDF_Dataset_Canonicalization
Roy: We decided no need to review earlier (per the wiki); I
propose to sign off.
janina: Yes, please do.
<Fredrik> No luck at all with Zoom today, have to look into
that further down the line. I type and read in the IRC and
that's very much okay for now.
<Fredrik> matatk: Want a hand with the WCA?
A11y Review Comment Tracker [31]https://w3c.github.io/
horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
[31] https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
janina: How do we recognize that some of these items have
timeouts and some don't? Seems they are two separate
interfaces, so we should have two separate items for now at
least.
<Fredrik> "Otherwise" sounds fine. I'll post you tonight.
rrsaigent, make minutes
new on TR [32]http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
[32] http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
Roy: no new publications this week.
CSS Update (Paul) [33]https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues
[33] https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues
PaulG: No new issues; will report on tonight's meeting next
week.
Actions Checkin (Specs) [34]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/
open
[34] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/open
janina: Reminder: Tracker is going away soon. We will move to
GitHub.
… If you need help, please ask me or Matthew.
… We are talking about making GitHub tracking easier in our
planning calls, and think we can resolve most of the issues
that we anticipate.
… If you have any concerns, please let us know as soon as you
can.
<Fredrik> janina: Will there be any particulars for W3C/WAI on
GitHub or will that be more or less standard issue githubbing
going on?
janina: Fredrik: we think it'll be fairly standard.
… We _may_ be able to tweak things/tooling for some people; we
are working on it, but nothing concrete yet.
Task Force & Deliverables Updates
<Fredrik> janina: Exciting, looking forward to further
developments!
Other Business
matatk: We had a great initial meeting with the Accessibility
for Childern Community Group and Adapt TF. Minutes:
[35]https://www.w3.org/2023/01/30-adapt-minutes.html
[35] https://www.w3.org/2023/01/30-adapt-minutes.html
janina: They've been working on some very interesting things,
including an ontology that we think will expand our use cases.
… The AC CG will be working on contributing ot our Explainer
document to highlight some curb cuts we can do in areas other
than symbols.
Fazio: I am looking into the research I mentioned a while back
on AAC devices and voices (and effects on learning); have
contact details. The work was done in the Bay area.
janina: Thank you David. Rachael had some pointers on some
similar-sounding work too, will forward those.
be done
janina: Thanks all!
Summary of resolutions
1. [36]APA avers we are ready for a Call for Consensus on our
draft proposed Charter at https://github.com/w3c/apa/blob/
charter-2023/charter.html
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[37]scribe.perl version 210 (Wed Jan 11 19:21:32 2023 UTC).
[37] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
--
Matthew Tylee Atkinson (he/him)
--
Principal Accessibility Engineer
TPG Interactive
https://www.tpgi.com
A Vispero Company
https://www.vispero.com
--
This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately.
Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2023 15:43:47 UTC