- From: Matthew Atkinson <matkinson@tpgi.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 10:38:48 +0000
- To: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group <public-apa@w3.org>
Hi all,
Minutes from this week's call can be found at https://www.w3.org/2022/08/24-apa-minutes.html and are repeated below for convenience of searching.
Thanks to Irfan for scribing.
Best regards,
Matthew
– DRAFT –
Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group Teleconference
24 August 2022
[2]IRC log.
[2] https://www.w3.org/2022/08/24-apa-irc
Attendees
Present
alii, Fredrik, janina, Joshue108, Matthew_Atkinson,
mike_beganyi, Roy
Regrets
-
Chair
Matthew_Atkinson
Scribe
alii, Irfan Ali
Contents
1. [3]Agenda Review & Announcements
1. [4]CSS CfC
2. [5]WCAG CfC
3. [6]Adapt CR
2. [7]New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/
issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+
requested%22
3. [8]A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/
horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
4. [9]new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
5. [10]Dangling Spec Review Cleanup: https://www.w3.org/WAI/
APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned
6. [11]APA Review of Draft AGWG Charter https://
raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/charter-2022/charter.html
7. [12]TPAC22 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/
TPAC_2022
8. [13]APA Review of Draft AGWG Charter https://
raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/charter-2022/charter.html
9. [14]TPAC22 https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/
TPAC_2022
10. [15]Summary of resolutions
Meeting minutes
Agenda Review & Announcements
CSS CfC
Matthew_Atkinson: call for consensus in progress
<Matthew_Atkinson> [16]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/
public-apa-admin/2022Aug/0021.html
[16] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2022Aug/0021.html
Matthew_Atkinson: it is only open until end of the day. please
vote
WCAG CfC
<Matthew_Atkinson> [17]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/
public-apa-admin/2022Aug/0023.html
[17] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2022Aug/0023.html
Matthew_Atkinson: we have 2.2 CI horizontal review, CFC. this
one will also open until end of the day.
janina: I will take a second look on the content.
janina: we may need to re-run for the CFC if we need to make
any content change
Adapt CR
Matthew_Atkinson: Janina can go in the details about the
process.
Matthew_Atkinson: we have a conformance section in specs of dos
and donts. we have a CFC for the people to adapt the changes.
janina: this requires documents consensus. I expect that pull
requests will be merged soon so that we can send a CFC
<Roy> [18]https://w3c.github.io/adapt/content/#conformance
[18] https://w3c.github.io/adapt/content/#conformance
Roy: I have reviewed two pull requests and merged it already.
Roy: janina can use the conformance section to review
Roy: there is a link in the implementation report. I will fix
all of the issues and merge it into the pull request
New Charters Review [19]https://github.com/w3c/strategy/
issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%2
2
[19] https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is:issue+is:open+label:"Horizontal+review+requested"
A11y Review Comment Tracker [20]https://w3c.github.io/
horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
[20] https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
new on TR [21]http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
[21] http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
Dangling Spec Review Cleanup: [22]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/
Category:Spec_Review_Assigned
[22] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Category:Spec_Review_Assigned
APA Review of Draft AGWG Charter [23]https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/
charter-2022/charter.html
[23] https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/charter-2022/charter.html
Matthew_Atkinson: we need to address this. we mentioned about
it last week. we want to get feedback form the people
Matthew_Atkinson: this is about formatting on all charters
Matthew_Atkinson: thats going to be addressed separately.
should concentrate if we have any question on the content. if
anyone has any questions/concerns on this proposed charter,
please let us know
janina: we should give a chance people to read it
janina: there was an assumption built to the charter. it
assumes that 2.2 went to the CR which becomes the w3
recommendations
janina: it talks about working on 3.0 which seems it all about.
we are only 2 weeks away from TPAC and we still do not have CR
ready.
janina: publishing 2.2 in CR doesn't mean we are done.
janina: I think we should split the advisory group into two
part. one can work on 2.2 and other can focus on 3.0
Matthew_Atkinson: wonder if we are practicing section 4 success
criteria
Matthew_Atkinson: this section doesn't make any sense in
reality
janina: APA agrees that WCAG is important and 2.2 and 3.0
should be allowed to continue unimpeded
we want to see 2.2. and 3.0 move forward
DRAFT RESOLUTION: APA confirms it considers both WCAG 2.2 and
WCAG 3 important for accessibility and wishes to say each of
them proceed unimpeded.
<janina> +1
+1
<mike_beganyi> +1
<Matthew_Atkinson> +1
<Fredrik> +1
janina: W3 policy requires disclosure on intellectual properly
and that has to happen during CR.
janina: advisory committee takes 30 days to approve the
proposed recommendations.
Matthew_Atkinson: do you think there ar any other option to
extended existing charter or rewrite it.
janina: there should be two groups
janina: they could take the charter from 2018 and change the
date.
Matthew_Atkinson: extend the current charter or split the
group?
janina: lets assume one year extension. at that point if it
still has not happened, what are we going to do?
Matthew_Atkinson: another option (arising from group
discussion) is not going for 2.2
TPAC22 [24]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2022
[24] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2022
APA Review of Draft AGWG Charter [25]https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/
charter-2022/charter.html
[25] https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/charter-2022/charter.html
<janina> +1 to current draft charter not meaningful
Matthew_Atkinson: who agrees that current charter is not
meaningful?
+1
<janina> +1
<mike_beganyi> +1
<Fredrik> +1
<Matthew_Atkinson> +1
Matthew_Atkinson: where do you think we should go with this?
<janina> DRAFT RESOLUTION: Current draft charter on github is
not meaningful path forward
<janina> +1
+1
<Matthew_Atkinson> +1
<mike_beganyi> +1
<Fredrik> +1
RESOLUTION: Current draft charter on github is not meaningful
path forward
RESOLUTION: APA confirms it considers both WCAG 2.2 and WCAG 3
important for accessibility and wishes to say each of them
proceed unimpeded.
TPAC22 [26]https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2022
[26] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2022
Matthew_Atkinson: we have scheduled 7 meetings and expecting
more to follow
<Matthew_Atkinson> [27]https://www.w3.org/2022/09/TPAC/
venue.html
[27] https://www.w3.org/2022/09/TPAC/venue.html
Summary of resolutions
1. [28]Current draft charter on github is not meaningful path
forward
2. [29]APA confirms it considers both WCAG 2.2 and WCAG 3
important for accessibility and wishes to say each of them
proceed unimpeded.
Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by
[30]scribe.perl version 192 (Tue Jun 28 16:55:30 2022 UTC).
[30] https://w3c.github.io/scribe2/scribedoc.html
--
Matthew Tylee Atkinson (he/him)
--
Principal Accessibility Engineer
TPG Interactive
https://www.tpgi.com
A Vispero Company
https://www.vispero.com
--
This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us immediately.
Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Friday, 26 August 2022 10:39:06 UTC