Re: Draft reply to question on PNG charter

Hi All,

Thinking off the top of my head...

> APA may have a great interest in horizontal review and / or feature
development, or it may have very little...

Do we want to give them more of a hint about what this means? (i.e. our
reviews generally look at user-interactions, as opposed to APIs and similar
'backend' constructs).

Not a hill to die on.

JF

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 12:28 PM Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote:

> I have an action to propose a reply to the question in our review of the
> proposed PNG charter:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/268
>
> We said we need to know more about the deliverables before signing off,
> and Chris said he thought it was covered. Proposed response:
>
> The information in the Background section is a useful introduction to the
> reasons for forming this WG. However, that is not part of the charter
> template and reads in a very "non-normative" way. Therefore we do not think
> it sufficiently defines the proposed chartered work. The scope should be
> more detailed about the meaning of "selected new features", at the very
> least mentioning the ones in the background, and also giving any indicators
> possible to other work currently on the horizon. APA may have a great
> interest in horizontal review and / or feature development, or it may have
> very little, depending on the nature of the work. More detail on that would
> inform subsequent comments about the level of coordination APA requests to
> be mentioned in the charter.
> Michael
>


-- 
*John Foliot* | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility

"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"