- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 00:40:27 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Joe Andrieu <joe@legreq.com>
- Cc: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>, public-rqtf@w3.org
Dear Manu, Joe: Back in January we promissed to think about "killer" use cases for verifiable credentials. We're a bit late getting back to you, but we have worked on this and come to a consensus on 6 use cases that we believe would be good for accessibility. One of these we believe is a poster worthy "killer" use case. Our top pick would, we believe, qualify as a "killer" use case for the following reasons: * It solves a real need--assuming supporting infrastructure is * eventually put in place; * It would simplify a process that is today very * cumbersome and time consuming; * It's an easily understood use case. You don't need accessibility * expertise to grok its value. The complete list is on this (APA) Research Questions Task Force (RQTF) wiki: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/research-questions/wiki/Some_use_cases_for_verifiable_credentials The first listed use case: "1.2.1 Cross-Border Transfer of Service Dogs and Comfort Animals" is the killer use case. Hoping this is helpful, Janina -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2020 04:40:52 UTC