- From: Xiaoqian Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 18:37:12 +0800
- To: Mathew Atkinson <matkinson@paciellogroup.com>
- Cc: lwatson@tetralogical.com, public-apa@w3.org
Thank you Matthew! APA++ -xiaoqian On 2020-05-14 18:29, Mathew Atkinson wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a quick follow up, to close the loop: per our discussion in the > APA meeting yesterday, we have concluded our review, with no concerns > to be raised. I have commented on the tracker thread [0], and > highlighted some of the positive changes relating to accessibility > that came up in the review. > > Best regards, > > > Matthew > > [0] <https://github.com/w3c/htmlwg/issues/8#issuecomment-628542511> > -- > Matthew Tylee Atkinson > -- > Senior Accessibility Engineer > The Paciello Group > https://www.paciellogroup.com > A Vispero Company > https://vispero.com > -- > This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not > the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system > and notify us immediately. > Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be > taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is > prohibited and may be unlawful. > > On 13/05/2020, 13:40, "Mathew Atkinson" <matkinson@paciellogroup.com> > wrote: > > Hi again all, > > I've completed review of the 'other' (i.e. non-highlighted) > commits now too. There were some that related to accessibility, but > none gave me concerns. In one case, accessibility advice had been > sought and accepted in the issue thread. > > I've attached summary HTML files for the reviews of the > highlighted and other commits. I think we may be discussing them in > the APA meeting later today, so will update you on timeframe for our > official confirmation of the review later. > > best regards, > > > Matthew > -- > Matthew Tylee Atkinson > -- > Senior Accessibility Engineer > The Paciello Group > https://www.paciellogroup.com > A Vispero Company > https://vispero.com > -- > This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not > the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system > and notify us immediately. > Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted > to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is > prohibited and may be unlawful. > > On 10/05/2020, 13:59, "Mathew Atkinson" > <matkinson@paciellogroup.com> wrote: > > Hi again Xiaoqian, Léonie and APA, > > It's slightly after Friday, but good news: I completed the > review of the 12 highlighted PRs and have one question and one > observation for the APA group, but don't expect either will result in > concerns being raised on HTML. I've reviewed 6 of the other 56 > commits, so still have 50 to go (no concerns so far, but I'm trying to > get them done as soon as I can, as I know time is tight). > > Question and observation for APA: If anyone has thoughts > on-list, then great. If not, perhaps we can discuss on our call? Here > they are... > > 1. One of the PRs is about changing the timing of autofocus > events. I do not believe this will or has caused any knock-on effects > for screen readers (having tried a few scenarios out IRL), but > wondering what we think about this as a group. The URL is: > https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/4763 and there are links to HTML > diffs in the first comment on the PR—though I am not sure how > accessible the HTML diffs are; I release now I had intended to look > into this after the last review...) Anyway, even if there did happen > to be implementation bugs, that's what they'd be—implementation, as > opposed to spec—bugs. > > 2. I have an observation about the 'delegatesFocus' option on > custom elements. Setting it to true when creating an element means > that if the user clicks on a non-focusable part inside the custom > element, then the first focusable part gets focus _and_ a :focus style > gets applied to the custom element as a whole. This came over from the > W3C Web Components spec, and I did find some concerns raised about how > this may look confusing to some users ( > https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/554 ) but ultimately this > was closed with no change to the status quo. I mention it because it > may be something that we want to keep up-to-date with, informally > perhaps, as the Web Components stack evolves. > > Best regards, > > > Matthew > -- > Matthew Tylee Atkinson > -- > Senior Accessibility Engineer > The Paciello Group > https://www.paciellogroup.com > A Vispero Company > https://vispero.com > -- > This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not > the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system > and notify us immediately. > Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or > omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this > message is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Received on Thursday, 14 May 2020 10:37:15 UTC