I do not want to make changes to the draft modules of personlization based on the objection to the APA charter. I think changes beyond an editors note have to have consensus of the task force. Remember we already have implementations of module 1 based on the examples as is. We should only change them with appropriate far discussion and strong consensus. All the best Lisa Seeman LinkedIn, Twitter ---- On Thu, 17 May 2018 22:20:09 +0300 Janina Sajka<janina@rednote.net> wrote ---- John: Responding to just one item in this email ... John Foliot writes: > >From today's APA Call, the following was recorded in the minutes: > > Michael: John is objecting to these examples. Not offering to clean them > up. We thought the examples are better than nothing for now. > > > Can I please know who the "we" is here? Was this group consensus decision > recorded anywhere? Is there a public or private URI or previous meeting > minutes I should review? > This understanding is based on the discussion of the examples in recent Personalization TF teleconferences, particularly Monday 30 April: http://www.w3.org/2015/10/27-aria-minutes.html#item0://www.w3.org/2018/04/30-personalization-minutes.html hth Janina -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2018 19:44:43 UTC