- From: Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 02:04:41 -0400
- To: David Wood <david.wood@ephox.com>
- Cc: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>, David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>, "public-rqtf@w3.org" <public-rqtf@w3.org>, DPUB mailing list <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 13:53 +1000, David Wood wrote: > > So how do you interpret this bit? > [[ > - Section 3.1: "BigRetailer receives a Web Publication from > EsteemedPublisher that it intends to add to its catalogue. > BigRetailer > wants to adds it own “teaser” via an alternative reading order. To > achieve > that, BigRetailer provides its own version of the publication’s > manifest, > that the user agent will use instead of the publisher’s manifest." > > Does that mean a replacement of a manifest file, or a different FRBR > manifest? It could be either. Well, "a manifistation" is a different word from "a manifest". There's no such thing as a frbr manifest. A manifest in PWP means a list of files. The BigRetailer adds a new entry to the list of files in the publication, the "teaser". Would the PWP spec be clearer if any references to FRBR were entirely removed? Liam -- Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2017 06:04:56 UTC