- From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 11:21:18 +0100
- To: Michiel Bijl <michiel.list@moiety.me>
- Cc: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
The second link in your email points to the repo for the Using ARIA Note, not the ARIA in HTML specification. On 26/07/2017 11:17, Michiel Bijl wrote: > There is (second link in previous email). However, those are not related accessibility. Includes things like attributes not listed in alphabetical order. > > — Michiel > >> On 26 Jul 2017, at 10:56, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote: >> >> Thanks Michiel. So to confirm, there are no issues open against the ARIA in HTML specification? >> >> Léonie. >> >>> On 26/07/2017 09:13, Michiel Bijl wrote: >>> Léonie, Janina, >>> The issues that came out of the review have been logged against the HTML spec [1] as requested by Steve. >>> There’s also an issue filed against ARIA in HTML [2] as a result of the review. >>> — Michiel >>> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/894 >>> [2]: https://github.com/w3c/using-aria/issues/26 >>>> On 25 Jul 2017, at 23:13, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk <mailto:tink@tink.uk>> wrote: >>>> Janina, >>>> >>>> APA was kind enough to review the ARIA in HTML spec a few months ago [1]. Michiel had an action to file issues against the ARIA in HTML specification and the action has been closed), but there don't seem to be any issues filed on the ARIA in HTML repo. >>>> >>>> Can you advise? Thanks. >>>> >>>> Léonie. >>>> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2017Jan/0023.html >>>> [2] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2109 >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe <mailto:tink@toot.cafe> tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe diem >>>> >> >> -- >> @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem >> > > -- @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 10:21:45 UTC