Fwd: [CSSWG][css-content] FPWD of CSS Generated Content L3

Dear APA members,

Is this on our radar yet? Would be good to do a review :)

—Michiel

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
> Subject: [CSSWG][css-content] FPWD of CSS Generated Content L3
> Date: 21 June 2016 at 00:00:49 GMT+2
> To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, "public-digipub-ig@w3.org" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>, "public-i18n-bidi@w3.org" <public-i18n-bidi@w3.org>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> 
> Okay, so it's *technically* not a FPWD, but since it's a near-complete
> rewrite of the 2003 draft, I'm announcing it as one, since it warrants
> that level of review. :)
> 
> The CSS WG has published an updated Working Draft of the
> CSS Generated and Replaced Content Module Level 3:
> 
>    https://www.w3.org/TR/css-content-3/
> 
> This is the first draft of a complete rewrite of this module, and is
> very rough. Major new functionality over Level 2 includes imports from
> the GCPM module such as:
>  * leaders
>  * target-counters
>  * named strings
>  * bookmark control
> plus a handy new syntax for alternate text:
>  content: url(sparkle.png) / "New!"
> 
> We expect future work on this module to be pinning down the actual
> syntax and behavior of all the exciting new features imported from
> GCPM. For those who want to toy with implementations, most CSS->PDF
> renderers already support a significant subset...
> 
> Significant changes since 2003 are listed at:
>  https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-css-content-3-20160602/
> 
> Please review the draft, and send any comments to the archived mailing
> list <www-style@w3.org>, prefixed with [css-content] (as I did on this
> message) or (preferably) file them in the CSSWG GitHub repository at
>  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues
> 
> For the CSS WG,
> ~fantasai
> 
>