W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-apa@w3.org > August 2016

Re: ACTION-2053: Draft-y language for Accessibility Considerations sections

From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 08:12:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJdbnOBC6pYhAmJEW9ianDVz9Otg3JggXaFH0nEHzyK_zJvEuA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Cc: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group <public-apa@w3.org>
Nice!  Friendly amendment?  I think that "widely differing physical
abilities" is more poetic than "widely different physical abilities".  What
do you think?

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:

> LGTM. I noticed a couple of tiny grammatical nits, so a tidied version is
> here:
> This specification has no defined user interface. Consequently, there are
> no specific accessibility requirements on implementations. However, to the
> extent that an implementation provides user interactions to support this
> specification, the implementation must ensure that the interface is exposed
> to the platform accessibility API. Moreover, implementors should take into
> consideration the needs of their users with varying abilities when
> designing solutions that implement this specification. For example, the use
> of biometric authentication techniques should be varied enough to allow for
> people with widely different physical abilities.
> Léonie.
> --
> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2016 13:13:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:01 UTC