Re: ACTION-2053: Draft-y language for Accessibility Considerations sections

Nice!  Friendly amendment?  I think that "widely differing physical
abilities" is more poetic than "widely different physical abilities".  What
do you think?

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:

> LGTM. I noticed a couple of tiny grammatical nits, so a tidied version is
> here:
>
> This specification has no defined user interface. Consequently, there are
> no specific accessibility requirements on implementations. However, to the
> extent that an implementation provides user interactions to support this
> specification, the implementation must ensure that the interface is exposed
> to the platform accessibility API. Moreover, implementors should take into
> consideration the needs of their users with varying abilities when
> designing solutions that implement this specification. For example, the use
> of biometric authentication techniques should be varied enough to allow for
> people with widely different physical abilities.
>
> Léonie.
> --
> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
>
>


-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops