- From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 20:38:42 -0400
- To: Jenn Evans <jennifer.evans@deque.com>
- Cc: "Joshue O'Connor - InterAccess" <josh@interaccess.ie>, Cleyra Uzcategui <cleyra.uzcategui@gmail.com>, "Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net)" <janina@rednote.net>, public-apa-admin@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAEy-OxEnd8abj=CvRZAuxaEMSpUhcq1huyp1mrdS+Bpr3CkAXw@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Fri, Mar 14, 2025, 6:22 PM Jenn Evans <jennifer.evans@deque.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025, 10:31 AM Joshue O'Connor - InterAccess < > josh@interaccess.ie> wrote: > >> Thank you Cleyra, Niklas and Gottfried for spotting typos, grammar >> gotchas and other suggestions! >> >> Appreciated. >> >> >> >> Joshue O'Connor >> *Director / InterAccess.ie* >> (+353) 01 961 0059 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From "Cleyra Uzcategui" <cleyra.uzcategui@gmail.com> >> To "Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net)" <janina@rednote.net> >> Cc public-apa-admin@w3.org >> Date 12/03/2025 5:02:12 PM >> Subject Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish AI-Accessibility FPWD >> >> Good draft. >> >> Here my comments: >> >> *Comments on typos and grammar issues: * >> >> Abstract section: >> >> "Machine learing technology also has unique and significant limitations." >> >> - Correction: learing should be learning. >> >> >> "illustrative of accessibiltiy-related applications..." >> >> - Correction: accessibiltiy should be accessibility. >> >> >> Accessibility context: >> >> "if machine learning algorithm may address broader accessibility >> issues..." >> >> - correction: algorithm should be algorithms. >> >> >> “existing web standard such as..." >> >> - correction: standard should be standards. >> >> >> Section 3.2 >> >> “yellow has been found the achieve the highest result...” >> >> - Correction: “yellow has been found to achieve the highest >> result...” >> >> >> “Until recently, the accuracy and validity of ASR techniques in the same >> language were considered as ineffective practices...” >> >> - Correction: Remove "as" — “...were considered ineffective >> practices...” >> >> >> Section 3.4 >> >> “...converting complex language content to the level of lower secondary >> reading abilities often require human intervention.” >> >> - Correction: "Require" should be "requires" >> >> >> Section 3.5 >> >> “Although there are few examples in a web context where the language of >> content is defined by machine learning processes...” >> >> - Correction: "Few" should be "a few” >> >> >> Section 4: >> >> “...and is capable of monitoring web content in real time.” >> >> - Correction: "Is" should be "are" (referring to tools) >> >> Another aspect I noticed is the inconsistent use of "colour" and "color" >> — please ensure all terms align with the same spelling convention (British >> vs. American English). >> >> >> *Comments on structure: * >> >> The logical flow of the document is good. The structure moves from the >> relevance of current standards (Section 3.1) into specific use cases — >> alternative text, ASR, plain language, etc. — before transitioning into >> evaluation tools and accessibility overlays. This sequence makes sense, >> starting with guidelines and ending with practical tools. >> >> >> *Suggestions on expanding scope: * >> >> *Cognitive Accessibility and AI:* >> >> Discuss how AI can support individuals with cognitive disabilities by >> simplifying navigation, reading comprehension, and time management. >> >> Example: AI tools that adjust web interfaces by minimizing distractions, >> providing summaries, or offering personalized reading levels. >> >> >> *Cultural and Multilingual Accessibility:* >> >> AI's ability to provide culturally aware translations — beyond literal >> text conversion — would be crucial for multilingual accessibility. >> >> The draft touched on Automated Language Detection, but it might be worth >> expanding into AI's role in ensuring content remains contextually >> appropriate when translated. >> >> Kind regards >> >> Cleyra Uzcategui >> >> *Software Engineer* >> >> *📞 *+44 (0)7756172116 >> >> >> On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 14:31, Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net) < >> janina@rednote.net> wrote: >> >>> Colleagues: >>> >>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform >>> Architectures (APA) Working Group proposing publication of a First Public >>> Working Draft (FPWD) of the Research Questions Task Force Note track >>> document: "Accessibility of machine learning and generative AI." We >>> generally refer to this document by its short name: "AI-Accessibility." >>> >>> * The snapshot to review for this CfC is here: >>> >>> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/ai-accessibility/FPWD-ai-accessbility/index..html >>> <https://raw.githack.com/w3c/ai-accessibility/FPWD-ai-accessbility/index.html> >>> >>> * RQTF's resolution requesting publication of the above snapshot >>> version as an APA Note is recorded here: >>> https://www.w3.org/2025/03/12-rqtf-minutes.html#e753 >>> >>> * The W3C Note track process is described here: >>> https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20231103/#note-track >>> >>> Please note the above snapshot will look slightly different when >>> published. The Status of this Document section will be updated, and the >>> document will display with different colorization to reflect the document's >>> FPWD status. >>> >>> As always with APA CfCs, editorial corrections, such as spelling or >>> grammar, will be made as needed without further notice. Please do draw >>> our attention to any editorial issues you find in this draft. >>> >>> >>> ***Action to Take*** >>> >>> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of >>> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though messages >>> of support are certainly welcome. >>> >>> If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this >>> proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later than >>> 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Wednesday 19 March. >>> >>> NOTE: This Call for Consensus is being conducted in accordance with the >>> APA Decision Policy published at: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy >>> >>> Janina and Matthew >>> APA Co-Chairs >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Janina Sajka (she/her/hers) >>> Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka >>> >>> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) >>> Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures >>> http://www.w3.org/wai/apa >>> >>> Linux Foundation Fellow >>> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/ >>> >>> >>>
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: IA_robot_only.jpg
- image/jpeg attachment: 02-IA_robot_only.jpg
Received on Saturday, 15 March 2025 00:38:59 UTC