Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish CTAUR for wide review

+1

Best wishes,
Leandro

---------------------------------------------------------------
*Leandro Soares Guedes*, Ph.D.

Postdoctoral Fellow
Faculty of Informatics
Università della Svizzera italiana (USI)
Lugano - Switzerland
http://leandro.guedes.com.br/

---------------------------------------------------------------


Em qui., 23 de mai. de 2024 às 11:31, Jeff Adams <jeff.adams@usablenet..com>
escreveu:

> +1
>
>
>
> Jeff Adams (he/him)
>
> Vice President – Accessibility Operations
>
>
> [image: UsableNet]
>
>
>
> *jeff.adams@usablenet.com <chris.werely@usablenet.com>*
>
> [image: Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies (CPACC)]
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net) <janina@rednote.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 22, 2024 7:26 AM
> *To:* public-apa-admin@w3.org <public-apa-admin@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish CTAUR for wide review
>
> Colleagues:
>
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform
> Architectures (APA) Working Group proposing  publication of an updated
> working draft publication of Collaborative Tools Accessibility User
> Requirements (CTAUR) for wide review.
>
> *       The proposed publication draft is available here:
>         https://raw.githack.com/w3c/ctaur/update-note-2024-06/index.html
>
> *       RQTF's RESOLUTION requesting a wide review publication is *
> recorded here:
>         https://www.w3.org/2024/05/22-rqtf-minutes.html#r01
>
> ***Background***
>
> The First Public Working Draft of CTAUR was published late in 2022. The
> draft recieved significant review and comment from our Cognitive and
> Learning Disabilities (COGA) Task Force, and the result of COGA's review
> is a much revised and strengthened document. However, RQTF is eager to
> obtain more review from the wider accessibility community before
> proposing advancing the document to W3C Working Group Note status.
>
> As always with an APA CfCs, editorial corrections, such as spelling or
> grammar, will be made as needed without further notice.  Please do draw
> our attention to any editorial issues you find in this draft.
>
> ***Action to Take***
>
> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of
> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though
> messages of support are certainly welcome.
>
> If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this
> proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later
> than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Wednesday 29 May.
>
> NOTE: This Call for Consensus is being conducted in accordance with the
> APA Decision Policy published at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy
>
> Janina and Matthew
>
>
> --
>
> Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
> Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka
>
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures     http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
>
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
>
>
>