Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish CTAUR for wide review

+1

From: Neha Manik Jadhav <njadhav@helixopp.com>
Date: Thursday, May 23, 2024 at 12:38
To: Jason J.G. White <jason@jasonjgw.net>, public-apa-admin@w3.org <public-apa-admin@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish CTAUR for wide review
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

+1

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Jason J.G. White <jason@jasonjgw.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 2:57:23 PM
To: public-apa-admin@w3.org <public-apa-admin@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish CTAUR for wide review


+1



On 22/5/24 10:26, Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net<mailto:janina@rednote.net>) wrote:

> Colleagues:

>

> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform

> Architectures (APA) Working Group proposing  publication of an updated

> working draft publication of Collaborative Tools Accessibility User

> Requirements (CTAUR) for wide review.

>

> *     The proposed publication draft is available here:

>       https://raw.githack.com/w3c/ctaur/update-note-2024-06/index.html

>

> *     RQTF's RESOLUTION requesting a wide review publication is *     recorded here:

>       https://www.w3.org/2024/05/22-rqtf-minutes.html#r01

>

> ***Background***

>

> The First Public Working Draft of CTAUR was published late in 2022. The

> draft recieved significant review and comment from our Cognitive and

> Learning Disabilities (COGA) Task Force, and the result of COGA's review

> is a much revised and strengthened document. However, RQTF is eager to

> obtain more review from the wider accessibility community before

> proposing advancing the document to W3C Working Group Note status.

>

> As always with an APA CfCs, editorial corrections, such as spelling or

> grammar, will be made as needed without further notice.  Please do draw

> our attention to any editorial issues you find in this draft.

>

> ***Action to Take***

>

> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of

> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though

> messages of support are certainly welcome.

>

> If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this

> proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later

> than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Wednesday 29 May.

>

> NOTE: This Call for Consensus is being conducted in accordance with the

> APA Decision Policy published at:

>

> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy

>

> Janina and Matthew

>

>