Re: Call for Consensus (CfC): Request re Reporting Spec

+1

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:36 AM Lionel Wolberger <lionel@userway.org>
wrote:

> +1
>
>
> Lionel Wolberger
> COO, UserWay Inc.
> lionel@userway.org
> UserWay.org <http://userway.org/>
>
> <https://t.sidekickopen90.com/s3t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7kF8cFFTBW4T_qld2zGCwVN8Jbw_8QsRtKVn1vXj1p1kknW16gGBN41Jd6G101?te=W3R5hFj4cm2zwW4hLZp04myBBCf43Wg2w04&si=8000000004174048&pi=36475989-d4b0-4eeb-d616-b3f559339005>[image:
> text]
>
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:28 AM Matthew Atkinson <matkinson@tpgi.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> --
>> Matthew Tylee Atkinson (he/him)
>> --
>> Senior Accessibility Engineer
>> TPG Interactive
>> https://www.tpgi.com
>> A Vispero Company
>> https://www.vispero.com
>> --
>> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify
>> us immediately.
>> Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be
>> taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited
>> and may be unlawful.
>>
>> On 24/05/2022, 20:28, "Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net)" <
>> janina@rednote.net> wrote:
>>
>>     CAUTION: This email originated outside Vispero. Do not click links,
>> open attachments or forward unless you recognize the sender.
>>
>>
>>     Colleagues:
>>
>>     This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform
>>     Architectures (APA) Working Group testing whether we have group
>>     consensus to approach the Web Performance Working Group[1] to explore
>>     whether their Reporting API technology might be usefully harnessed for
>>     accessibility purposes. The proposed outreach message follows:
>>
>>     ***beginning of suggested Message***
>>
>>     Colleagues:
>>
>>     The Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Working Group has again
>> reviewed your specification:
>>
>>     https://www.w3.org/TR/reporting/
>>
>>     We have no issues from the perspective of our horizontal review
>> responsibility. That is not why we're writing you at this time.
>>
>>     We have realized that there may be multiple ways to use your
>> specification in support of conformance to various accessibility standards
>> specifications. Would you be amenable to exploring an Accessibility
>> endpoint addition to your specification with us?
>>
>>     We can conceive of many ways to use such a mechanism. For example,
>> the accessibility endpoint could be used by assistive technology (AT), user
>> agents, browser extensions/plugins, and automated web scanning tools to
>> report on specific failures to meet WCAG success criteria, especially where
>> today's dynamic content is invisible to current
>>     standard auditing processes. This may align with or build on existing
>> work from Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT). Perhaps it could also be
>> used to capture accessibility feedback or problem reports from visitors to
>> the site.
>>
>>     These are likely best explained in a teleconference setting by way of
>> an initial check to ensure our understanding and expectations match.
>>
>>     If you agree our proposal has merit, we would look for ways to
>> specify the initial endpoint and any additional aspects as may be relevant.
>>
>>     What do you think? Is this a reasonable application of your
>> technology? Might we schedule an hour sometime soon to explore the
>> possibilities with you and discuss next steps if moving forward appears
>> reasonable?
>>
>>     Thanking you in advance for your consideration of our request,
>>
>>     Janina Sajka & Matthew Atkinson
>>     APA Co-Chairs
>>
>>     ***Action to Take***
>>
>>     This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of
>>     support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though
>>     messages of support are certainly welcome.
>>
>>     If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning
>> this
>>     proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later
>>     than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Wednesday 1 June.
>>
>>     NOTE: This Call for Consensus is being conducted in accordance with
>> the
>>     APA Decision Policy published at:
>>
>>     http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy
>>
>>     [1] https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/webperf
>>
>>     --
>>
>>     Janina Sajka
>>
>>     Linux Foundation Fellow
>>     Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:       http://a11y.org
>>
>>     The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative
>> (WAI)
>>     Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures
>> http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
>>
>>
>>
>>

-- 

*Alisa Smith, **CPACC
<https://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpacccertification>*

*AudioEye <https://www.audioeye.com/>*

asmith@audioeye.com

+1 (678) 300-4553

US Eastern Time Zone

-- 
The information in this communication is intended for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and/or exempt from disclosure under law. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited.

Received on Thursday, 26 May 2022 16:34:24 UTC