- From: Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net) <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2021 04:41:55 -0400
- To: public-apa-admin@w3.org
- Cc: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
Colleagues: The Call for Consensus (CfC) below recieved only messages in support of the proposed actions. Our draft comment is therefore agreed to as a consensus decision of APA and will now be forwarded to the CSS-WG. The head of thread for this CfC can be found at this link: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2021Apr/0025.html Best, Janina and Becky Janina Sajka writes: > Colleagues: > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform > Architectures (APA) Working Group testing whether we have group > consensus on comments and an Accessibility Considerations section > request to the CSS Working Group regarding their css-multicol-1 > specification as follows: > > <beginning of suggested comment> > > Per [request for a11y-review](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues/2) of the [Multi-column Layout Module Level 1](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-multicol-1/#the-multi-column-model): > > APA agrees with the concerns Rachel brought forth and has nothing more to add to those concerns. > > However, APA does request an Accessibility Considerations section be added, which acknowledges potential issues and references WCAG. Statement could read: > > "Setting container height and line length can pose challenges for people with visual or cognitive disabilities. See [WCAG Success Criterion 1.4.10 Reflow](https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/reflow.html) and > [WCAG 1.4.8 Visual Presentation]( https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/quickref/#visual-presentation) to understand user needs." > > At the end of Section 2 of the spec, a note is already present about accessibility issues occurring if the column's height exceeds the viewport height. Adding a page anchor at this point to lead down to the new > Accessibility Concerns section would likely be helpful to folks exploring the spec. It could read: > > "See Accessibility Concerns for additional details." > > Also, please add the label `a11y-needs-resolution` to this issue. > > <end suggested comment> > > ***Action to Take*** > > This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of > support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though > messages of support are certainly welcome. > > If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this > proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later > than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Wednesday 5 May. > > NOTE: This Call for Consensus is being conducted in accordance with the > APA Decision Policy published at: > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy > > Janina and Becky > > -- > > Janina Sajka > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa > -- Janina Sajka https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2021 08:42:12 UTC