- From: Janina Sajka (janina@rednote.net) <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 04:34:43 -0400
- To: public-apa-admin@w3.org
- Cc: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@microsoft.com>
Colleagues: The Call for Consensus below received only responses of support. It is therefore agreed as a formal consensus of APA. The head of thread for this CfC is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa-admin/2019Oct/0011.html Best, Janina Janina Sajka writes: > Colleagues: > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform > Architectures (APA) Working Group on a proposed Accessibility > Considerations addendum to the WebRTC 1.0 specification: > > https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/ > > ***Begin Proposed Section > ------------------ > > Accessibility considerations [New section, informative] > > The WebRTC 1.0 specification exposes an API to control protocols (defined > within the IETF) necessary to establish real-time audio, video and data > exchange. > > Real-time Text, defined in RFC 4103 on which people who are deaf or hard of > hearing (among others) rely on for their communication needs, utilizes T.140 > encapsulated in RTP to enable the transition from TDD/TTY devices to IP-based > communications. Support for RFC 4103 is especially important as it is being > established as the new and more reliable mechanism for text communications > with Public Safety Access Points (PSAP).[1] > > Since Real-time Text requires the ability to send and receive data in near > real time, it can be best supported via the WebRTC 1.0 data channel API. As > defined by the IETF, the data channel protocol utilizes the SCTP/DTLS/UDP > protocol stack, which supports both reliable and unreliable data channels. The > IETF chose to standardize SCTP/DTLS/UDP over proposals for an RTP data channel > which relied on SRTP key management and were focused on unreliable > communications. > > Since the IETF chose a different approach than the RTP data channel as part of > the WebRTC suite of protocols, as of the time of this publication there is no > standardized way for the WebRTC APIs to directly support Real-time Text as > defined at IETF and implemented in U.S. (FCC) regulations. The WebRTC working > Group will evaluate whether the developing IETF protocols in this space > warrant direct exposure in the browser APIs and is looking for input from the > relevant user communities on this potential gap. > > Within the IETF MMUSIC WG, work is ongoing to enable Real-time text to be sent > over the WebRTC data channel, allowing gateways to be deployed to translate > between the SCTP data channel protocol and RFC 4103 Real-time text. This work, > once completed, would enable a unified and interoperable approach for > integrating real-time text in WebRTC user-agents (including browsers) - > through a gateway or otherwise. > > MMUSIC-T140: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-holmberg-mmusic-t140-usage-data-channel > > At the time of this publication, gateways that enable effective RTT support in > WebRTC clients can be developed e.g. through a custom WebRTC data channel. > > This is deemed sufficient until such time as future standardized gateways are > enabled via IETF protocols such as the SCTP data channel protocol and RFC 4103 > Real-time text. This will need to be defined at IETF in conjunction with > related work in W3C groups to effectively and consistently standardise RTT > support internationally. > > > [1] https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=ada7cebd65433a9e05c35426a2bc76b8&mc=true&node=pt47.3.67&rgn=div5 > ------------------ > > ***Action to Take*** > > This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of > support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though > messages of support are certainly welcome. > > If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this > proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later > than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Sunday 20 October. > > NOTE: This Call for Consensus is being conducted in accordance with the > APA Decision Policy published at: > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy > > Thanks especially to our Research Questions Task Force (RQTF) > for working with WebRTC to develop this addendum. > > Janina > > -- > > Janina Sajka > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa > -- Janina Sajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Monday, 21 October 2019 08:34:53 UTC