Re: 48-Hour Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish CAPTCHA Wide Review Draft

+1 to publish. (+1 to correcting the minor edits noted previously before
going LIVE with this however)

JF

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:33 AM Chris O'Brien <chris.obrien@ami.ca> wrote:

> +1
>
> One small spelling error:
>
> "Obviously, this would be idea and we..." should be "ideal"
>
> Chris O'Brien
> Accessibility Officer
> 416-818-9411
> ami.ca
> Facebook | YouTube | Twitter
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Becky Gibson <becky@knowbility.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 10:08 AM
> To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
> Cc: Accessible Platform Architectures Administration <
> public-apa-admin@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: 48-Hour Call for Consensus (CfC): Publish CAPTCHA Wide Review
> Draft
>
> +1 Nice work!
>
> Just a few minor editing issues that I noticed:
>
> Section 3.5
> last line of last paragraph, extra w
> and honeypots which are designs intended to be ignored, or even to be
> invisible w to users while trapping robotic responses.
>
> Section 4.1
>
> end of 2nd paragraph: polisy vs policy
> The Privacy Polisy is required to satisfy legal requirements in California
> and in the E.U.
>
> Within the 5th paragraph: idea / ideal
> Obviously, this would be idea and we believe Google has adopted several
> strategies recommended here toward achieving that goal.
>
> last paragraph in section: Sentence beginning with this constitutes is not
> captitalized.
> data. this constitutes a significant cost to the user's privacy in an
> industry so
>
> > On Jan 24, 2019, at 8:04 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
> >
> > Colleagues:
> >
> > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform
> > Architectures (APA) Working Group seeking consensus to publish the
> > "Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA" document for wide review.
> >
> > The draft to review for this CfC is here:
> >
> > https://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/f257fe3930a483f3205b128211c1cb122c2180
> > ca/captcha/index.html
> >
> > This draft has undergone extensive revision since our FPWD last year
> > in response to comments received, and in response to additional analysis.
> >
> > Please note that no substantive nor editorial changes will be applied
> > during the CfC to the above URI.
> >
> > *       ACTION TO TAKE
> >
> > This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of
> > support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though
> > messages of support are certainly welcome.
> >
> > We particularly welcome questions and suggested edits, though this
> > could delay publication. It's important we get this draft right.
> >
> > If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning
> > this proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no
> > later than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Sunday 3 February.
> >
> > NOTE: This Call for Consensus is being conducted in accordance with
> > the APA Decision Policy published at:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy
> >
> > Thanks to our Research Questions Task Force (RQTF) for their extensive
> > work on this revision draft.
> >
> > Janina
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------
> >
> > Janina Sajka
> >
> > Linux Foundation Fellow
> > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:http://a11y.org
> >
> > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectureshttp://www.w3.org/wai/apa
> >
> >
>
>
> ________________________________
>  This email, including any attachments, is intended only for the person(s)
> to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information. Any unauthorized distribution, disclosure or use is
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, please
> contact the sender and delete this email, including any attachments,
> immediately. Thank you.
>
>

-- 
*​John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative
Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
deque.com