- From: Becky Gibson <becky@knowbility.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:38:38 -0500
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: Accessible Platform Architectures Administration <public-apa-admin@w3.org>
+1 Becky Gibson > On Feb 11, 2019, at 9:31 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > > Colleagues: > > This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform > Architectures (APA) Working Group on a proposed APA comment to the > Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group, concerning > their now stable Use Cases and Requirements document > > **Background** > > The Abstract of this POE document states: > > "This document includes a set of use cases and requirements, compiled by > the Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group, that > motivate the expression of statements about digital content usage. All > use cases provide realistic examples describing how people and > organisations may (or want to be able to) specify statements about > digital content usage. The requirements derived from these use cases > will be used to guide the development of the POE WG recommendation > deliverables for the Information Model, Vocabulary, and Encodings." > > **Suggested Comment** > > The Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Working Group has reviewed > the POE's Use Cases and Requirements document at: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/poe-ucr/ > > > We were unable to find the following accessibility use case in this document and request it be added to this document and appropriately addressed in all resulting normative specifications. > > Historically, similar schemes have been used to deny content access to > assistive technology users, e.g. Microsoft Reader, Adobe PDF (which to > this day includes a checkbox for denying AT access). > > POE should clearly state its intention to include alternate access > technologies among it's licensed uses, and require implementing > technologies to insure they will not be blocked, neither intentionally > nor incidentally. > > * ACTION TO TAKE > > This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of > support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though > messages of support are certainly welcome. > > If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this > proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later > than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Sunday 17 February. > > NOTE: This Call for Consensus is being conducted in accordance with the > APA Decision Policy published at: > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy > > Reference: APA Action-2185 > https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2185 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Janina Sajka > > Linux Foundation Fellow > Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) > Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2019 14:39:06 UTC