- From: Drake, Ted <Ted_Drake@intuit.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:40:14 +0000
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, "public-apa-admin@w3.org" <public-apa-admin@w3.org>
Thank you for putting this together. I believe the biometrics example is useful. You have my support for moving forward. Ted Drake, Intuit On 8/19/16, 6:48 AM, "Janina Sajka" <janina@rednote.net> wrote: Colleagues: This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Working Group on our review of three Web Payments API specifications. * Background Information APA's review of the following three API specifications relating to payment transactions via the web was requested by the Web Payments Working Group at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Apr/0050.html 1.) Payment Request API http://www.w3.org/TR/payment-request/ This specification describes a web API to allow merchants (i.e., web sites selling physical or digital goods) to easily accept payments from different payment methods with minimal integration. User agents (e.g. browsers) will facilitate the payment flow between merchant and user. 2.) Payment Method Identifiers http://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-id/ This document defines payment method identifier strings so that components in the payment ecosystem can determine which parties support which payment methods. 3.) Basic Card Payment http://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-basic-card/ This specification describes the data formats used by the Payment Request API to support payment by payment cards such as credit or debit cards. Review of these three specifications was referred to APA's Web Payments Subteam, whose deliberations on these specifications are available in recent teleconference minutes and publically archived email threads: 1.) Subteam Minutes https://www.w3.org/2016/08/04-apa-minutes.html https://www.w3.org/2016/08/18-apa-minutes.html 2.) Email Threads http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Aug/0015.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016Aug/0067.html * Proposed Comment The Accessible Platform Architectures (APA) Working Group has found no specific problem in these three API specifications themselves. However, we do request addition of the following section to each specification: Accessibility Impact Statement This specification has no defined user interface. In addition, there are no specific accessibility requirements on implementations. However, to the extent that an implementation provides user interactions in support of this specification, the implementation must ensure that the interface for those interactions is exposed to the platform accessibility API. Moreover, implementors should take into consideration the needs of their users with varying abilities when designing solutions that implement this specification. As an example, the use of biometric authentication techniques should provide for enough variation to allow for people with widely differing physical abilities. See the W3C Accessibility Guidelines documents for more information. * ACTION TO TAKE This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though messages of support are certainly welcome. If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later than 23:59 (Midnight) Boston Time, Tuesday 26 August. Janina -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Friday, 19 August 2016 20:40:48 UTC