- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:57:23 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
I think /this/ issue is "should there be a recommendation that `processingLanguage` is one of the entries in `language`?". I propose that there's no reason to make that a requirement, allowing implementations to generate the values in separate subsystems without reconciling them. Maybe the processingLanguage is "en-UK" (e.g. for spelling colour) and the language is just "en" to make it easier to discover. Propose Close, as there are no use cases/requirements and at least one scenario where not having the requirement makes implementations easier. -- GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/343#issuecomment-256687692 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 15:57:30 UTC