Re: [web-annotation] Relationship between dc:language and processing language for multilingual resources

I think /this/ issue is "should there be a recommendation that 
`processingLanguage` is one of the entries in `language`?".  I propose
 that there's no reason to make that a requirement, allowing 
implementations to generate the values in separate subsystems without 
reconciling them.  Maybe the processingLanguage is "en-UK" (e.g. for 
spelling colour) and the language is just "en" to make it easier to 

Propose Close, as there are no use cases/requirements and at least one
 scenario where not having the requirement makes implementations 

GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
Please view or discuss this issue at
 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 15:57:30 UTC