- From: BigBlueHat via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:45:22 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@riannella as far as I can tell, we haven't stated that one can license the facts just that if you are asserting rights over those statements, that's where you'd put them. Whether or not any legal system on the planet will care (or how much and to what end) is certainly beyond the scope of this group. RDF as IPR, though, does seem to fall decidedly in the lap of the POE WG, however. Likely, you'll bee seeing a few of us join that WG and mailing lists in hopes of at least watching how it plays out. :smile: Additionally, we can't run on the assumption that the Annotation and Body (and certainly not the Targets) are made at the same time, or by the same entity, etc. It's completely possible for an annotation to be created by myself, targeting a work written eons ago, and using it's Wikipedia page as one (but not the only) body--such that each of those things MAY have its own `rights` statement assigned within the Annotation, and would certainly have it's own copyright, license, etc. -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBlueHat Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/360#issuecomment-252974259 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2016 16:45:30 UTC