W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2016

Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the 22nd of November

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:53:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CABevsUEfxV3vQ+GB=p_=e8w=+ObrsTgjSgr6RjDbG=rQwcXHPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
A list of selectors to be processed in order should use refinedBy now,
instead of a List.

R

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
wrote:

> So...given that these (Composite, Independents, and List) are coming out,
> what does someone intending to use them need to do?
>
>
> I have examples of Wiley-derived annotations that currently use List to
> express a list (heh) of selectors which are intended to be processed in
> order.
>
>
> I didn't submit those examples as there were several other bugs with
> them--the general shape is spot-on, but someone use idiosyncratic values
> for "type" (Java classes or some such... >_>).
>
>
> I could fix them by hand--as bugs for those issues have been reported and
> I hope will be in progress soon. However, I'm also guessing it's "too
> little; too late?"
>
> Happy Monday, all,
>
> Benjamin
>
>
> --
>
> http://bigbluehat.com/
>
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:11:09 AM
> *To:* Robert Sanderson
> *Cc:* Tim Cole; Shane McCarron; W3C Public Annotation List
>
> *Subject:* Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the
> 22nd of November
>
>
> On 22 Nov 2016, at 21:54, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I don't think we should leave them in the context document. I took them
> out, but the re-revision may have resulted in the wrong version getting put
> into ns/
>
> The most recent version is:
>
>     https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/jsonld/anno.jsonld
>
>
> As an aside, should I update the /ns file with this one? We may want to
> have an agreement on the issue…
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
> which doesn't have them.
>
> R
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Timothy Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Since the model features moved to informative appendix of the model were
>> optional (i.e., may or should rather than must), I do not believe we need
>> to rearrange any of the Annotation model tests.
>>
>>
>>
>> HOWEVER, the json keys Composite, Independents, and List are no longer in
>> our ontologies, although they are still present in our JSON-LD context
>> document, and do appear in informative 'Proposed Definitions' appendix in
>> the Vocab Rec.  So do we want to remove the handful of tests that do
>> reference these keys? Thoughts? Personally, if we're going to leave these
>> keys in our context document, I'd suggest leaving the tests in place as a
>> convenience for developers going forward.  If we decide to remove these
>> three keys from our context document then we probably should remove the
>> tests.
>>
>>
>>
>> We definitely will need to update the test to Exit criteria mapping and
>> the references to CR.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Tim Cole
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2016 9:20 AM
>> *To:* Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
>> *Cc:* W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on
>> the 22nd of November
>>
>>
>>
>> From my point of view:
>>
>>
>>
>> - some tests may have to pushed down to the optional spaces
>>
>> - the corresponding mapping table should be changed
>>
>> - the references to the CR should be updated:-)
>>
>>
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22 Nov 2016, at 15:29, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Do we need to make any changes to the test suites?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> FYI
>>
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
>>
>> *Subject: Re: Publication request: 2 documents for CR publication on the
>> 22nd of November*
>>
>> *Date: *22 November 2016 at 10:34:31 GMT+1
>>
>> *To: *Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, webreq <webreq@w3.org>
>>
>> *Cc: *W3C Communication Team <w3t-comm@w3.org>, Xueyuan Jia (贾雪远) <
>> xueyuan@w3.org>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Tim Cole <
>> t-cole3@illinois.edu>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
>>
>> *X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: *No, score=-9.8
>>
>> *Message-Id: *<24995815-01a7-e3c9-dd04-b5b20fb6b53b@w3.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The documents have been published on http://www.w3.org/TR/.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Denis
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Shane McCarron
>>
>> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Rob Sanderson
> Semantic Architect
> The Getty Trust
> Los Angeles, CA 90049
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Digital Publishing Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Semantic Architect
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049
Received on Monday, 28 November 2016 15:53:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:50 UTC