RE: RN Annotation Results integrated

Section 5 of the Annotation Model Rec models and specifies requirements for Annotation Collections and Annotation Pages.  In practice these are only being created right now by those implementing the Protocol, so Protocol implementers are also the only ones who are implementing Section 5 of the Annotation Model Rec. So the Protocol implementations will appear also in the model implementation report, albeit typically only with regard to Section 5.

-Tim Cole


________________________________
From: Ivan Herman [ivan@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 12:23
To: Shane McCarron
Cc: W3C Public Annotation List
Subject: Re: RN Annotation Results integrated


On 18 Nov 2016, at 10:19, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io<mailto:shane@spec-ops.io>> wrote:

Normal?  Perhaps not.  I mean - remember the RI is ONLY a protocol server, so it serves up pages and a container.  That is what is being tested.  Not annotations.  It is not a client.

I am not sure I understand. RI appears in the model report, ie, if it is in the protocol only, then it should not appear in the model report…

I.


On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org<mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
Great!

But… is it normal to have a 'reference implementation' with a fully yellow entries?

Ivan

On 17 Nov 2016, at 14:51, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io<mailto:shane@spec-ops.io>> wrote:

Another implementation in the report at [1]!

[1] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html

--
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153<tel:%2B31-641044153>
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704







--
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704