- From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:19:35 -0600
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 18 November 2016 18:20:35 UTC
Normal? Perhaps not. I mean - remember the RI is ONLY a protocol server, so it serves up pages and a container. That is what is being tested. Not annotations. It is not a client. On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Great! > > But… is it normal to have a 'reference implementation' with a fully yellow > entries? > > Ivan > > On 17 Nov 2016, at 14:51, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote: > > Another implementation in the report at [1]! > > [1] https://w3c.github.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html > > -- > Shane McCarron > Projects Manager, Spec-Ops > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Digital Publishing Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > > > > -- Shane McCarron Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Friday, 18 November 2016 18:20:35 UTC