This isn't our documented exit criteria:-( Ivan ---- Ivan Herman +31 641044153 (Written on my mobile. Excuses for brevity and frequent misspellings...) > On 11 Nov 2016, at 21:41, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote: > > wait wait wait.... > > Liam said "If it is optional, isn't one implementation enough?" > > Umm.... maybe? Can someone check on that? > >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> Liam, >> >> we do plan to publish a revised CR... >> >> Ivan >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman >> +31 641044153 >> >> (Written on my mobile. Excuses for brevity and frequent misspellings...) >> >> >> >> > On 11 Nov 2016, at 20:48, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote: >> > >> >> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 10:02 -0800, Robert Sanderson wrote: >> >> One of our exit criteria is: >> >> >> >> The bodyValue property of an Annotation. >> >> >> >> However according to the report ( >> >> http://td.spec-ops.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html), we >> >> have only >> >> one implementation of bodyValue (EF). It's 1:4 in the annotation >> >> optionals >> >> section. >> >> >> >> I don't believe we'll get a second implementation of it, so do we: >> >> >> >> * Just remove the exit criterion, as it's an optional feature anyway >> > >> > That sounds like a substantive change, so you could publish a new LCCR. >> > >> > But, if it's an optional feature, isn't one implementation enough? >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Shane McCarron > Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Friday, 11 November 2016 20:51:49 UTC