Re: URGENT: bodyValue

This isn't our documented exit criteria:-(

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman
+31 641044153

(Written on my mobile. Excuses for brevity and frequent misspellings...)



> On 11 Nov 2016, at 21:41, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
> 
> wait wait wait....
> 
> Liam said "If it is optional, isn't one implementation enough?"
> 
> Umm.... maybe?  Can someone check on that?
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> Liam,
>> 
>> we do plan to publish a revised CR...
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman
>> +31 641044153
>> 
>> (Written on my mobile. Excuses for brevity and frequent misspellings...)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On 11 Nov 2016, at 20:48, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@w3.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 2016-11-11 at 10:02 -0800, Robert Sanderson wrote:
>> >> One of our exit criteria is:
>> >>
>> >>     The bodyValue property of an Annotation.
>> >>
>> >> However according to the report (
>> >> http://td.spec-ops.io/test-results/annotation-model/all.html), we
>> >> have only
>> >> one implementation of bodyValue (EF).  It's 1:4 in the annotation
>> >> optionals
>> >> section.
>> >>
>> >> I don't believe we'll get a second implementation of it, so do we:
>> >>
>> >> * Just remove the exit criterion, as it's an optional feature anyway
>> >
>> > That sounds like a substantive change, so you could publish a new LCCR.
>> >
>> > But, if it's an optional feature, isn't one implementation enough?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops

Received on Friday, 11 November 2016 20:51:49 UTC