W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-annotation@w3.org > November 2016

Web Anno Agenda: Telco - 2016-11-11

From: Tim Cole <t-cole3@illinois.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:38:50 -0600
To: "'W3C Public Annotation List'" <public-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <081501d23b92$78988090$69c981b0$@illinois.edu>
Web Annotation Working Group Teleconference Agenda for Friday November 11
2016 

(11am Eastern US, 8am Pacific US, 16:00 UTC -- Note US & most of Europe are
now both on 'winter' time; for those in locales that do not change to winter
time, call time starting tomorrow will be one hour later than during the
summer).

 

Logistics / Call in details:

- IRC channel ( irc.w3.org <http://irc.w3.org>   ): #annotation.

- WebEx via computer:

   https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=m2c99abd2f8cea21e3e3c33c9c2626eec  

               or direct dial in: +1-617-324-0000 <tel:%2B1-617-324-0000> 

  Meeting Number / Access Code: 645 413 954

 

Agenda (Chairs:  Tim Cole,  Rob Sanderson):

 

1. Scribe Selection, Agenda Review, Announcements, Minutes Approval

   PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Minutes of the previous call are approved:
https://www.w3.org/2016/10/28-annotation-minutes.html 

 

2. Issue Updates, if any   

 

3. Implementation / Testing Status -

    For which features do we NOT yet have 2 implementations? As of last week
we were lacking 2 implementations for:

   -  A Choice of resources, used as the Body of an Annotation        

   -  A Choice of resources, used as the Target of an Annotation

   -  [creator for] . a resource used as the Body of an Annotation.

   -  [creator for] . a resource used as the Target of an Annotation.

      DECISION - do we need to remove or put in non-normative appendix any
of these features and extend CR? If so, need to make this decision during
the call, if possible.

 

   Because the tests were late getting deployed, we also do not yet have a
test result report showing 2 implementations of Annotation Collections and
Annotation Pages, but we believe we have at least 2 compliant
implementations.

 

4. Finalizing reports and other information needed for request to exit CR

     A preliminary Google sheet provides current snapshot of mapping between
Model exit criteria and individual sub-tests / assertions:

 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PKpODhRgecp7Vl8GfJIl0xL3gH_eJMTcogCd
BKT1dQg/edit?usp=sharing

 

    For reporting, we will need to roll up multiple annotations from single
implementation. 

 

   Need to review status of protocol testing report

 

    What else is needed to get test reports ready to document readiness to
exit CR?

   

   NB: the template we need to fill in as part of process to exit CR is
here:

 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/blob/gh-pages/admin/PRTransitionAdmin/
PRTransitionRequest.md

 

Time allowing, we will revisit:

 

5. Post WG planning (errata maintenance)

 

6. WG Notes

 

7. AOB

   Next meeting?

 

8. Adjourn

 
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2016 20:39:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:50 UTC