Re: [web-annotation] Activity vocab (FOAF v vCard Ontology)

Yes, we re-use some but not all of the Activity Streams classes and 
properties. We also, for example, don't use their notion of a Note, or
 a Link.  FOAF is more broadly adopted, and especially as AS hasn't 
even made it through CR yet, we have limited our use of it to those 
features we couldn't find in existing normative specifications.

Hope that helps?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/375#issuecomment-259502123
 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2016 19:24:41 UTC